The
Christian faith centers on the figure of Jesus Christ. Belief
in Jesus, his deity, his sacrificial death, and his resurrection
are essential to salvation.
It
follows that Jesus would be the focal point for attack from Christianity's
critics. Attacks come from a variety of angles and involve several
myths concerning Jesus' life, death, and resurrection.
Jesus
was fully human. He was born to a Jewish family and lived his
life in the lands surrounding Jerusalem. He cried, slept, worked, and was hungry.
He knew anger, sadness, and was even near despair on the night
before his death. He was also fully divine, equal with the Father,
and given all authority in heaven and on earth.
This
section will focus on refuting the most common attacks against
the figure, character, deity, and resurrection of Jesus by answering
the following myths:
Myth
#1: Jesus never existed.
Myth
#2: It is impossible to know the truth about Jesus since
he lived so long ago.
Myth
#3: Jesus was not born of a virgin.
Myth
#4: Jesus never claimed to be God.
Myth
#5: Jesus was just a good teacher or prophet.
Myth
#6: Jesus did not rise from the dead.
"This Jesus of Nazareth,
without money and arms, conquered more millions than Alexander,
Caesar, Mohammed, and Napoleon; without sciences and learning,
he shed more light on things human and divine than all philosophers
and scholars combined; without the eloquence of schools, he spoke
such words of life as were never spoken before or since, and
produced effects which lie beyond the reach of orator or poet;
without writing a single line, he set more pens in motion, and
furnished themes for more sermons, orations, discussions, learned
volumes, works of art, and songs of praise than the whole army
of great men of ancient and modern times."
Philip Schaff,
historian, Exposing the Myths about Jesus
Myth # 1: Jesus never
existed.
There
is no scholarly ground to stand on when it comes to a claim that,
historically, Jesus never lived. Many Christian and
non-Christian sources reference Jesus, demonstrating that he
lived, performed miracles, gathered a following, angered the
Jews by claiming to be the Messiah, and was crucified under Pontius
Pilate about AD 30. Even non-Christian histories report his supposed
resurrection and the growth of the Christian sect that followed.
They also purport that Jesus was worshiped as God by the early
church.
The
New Testament contains twenty-seven separate documents which
were written in the first century AD and contain the story of
the life of Jesus and the beginnings of th Christian
church. These facts were recorded by eyewitnesses. The Jewish
historian Flavius Josephus, born AD 37, also records the existence
of Jesus. Cornelius Tacitus (AD 112), a Roman historian, wrote about Jesus Christ
while writing about the reign of Emperor Nero. He wrote of the
existence of Christians in Rome and referred to Christianity when alluding
to the burning of the temple of Jerusalem in AD 70. This history has been preserved
by Sulpicius Severus.
Other references to Jesus and his followers occur in the writings
of the Roman historian Seutonius (AD
120).
"The testimony,
both Christian and non-Christian, is more than sufficient to lay to
rest any idea that Jesus, in fact, never existed. In light of
the evidence, it is absurd to hold such a view."
Josh McDowell and Don Stewart, Answers
Myth #2: It is impossible
to know the truth about Jesus since he lived so long ago.
Refer
to sections in this book on documentary support for the New Testament
and historical reliability of the New Testament.
In
short, between biblical and other historical accounts, we have as much or more information
about Jesus than about most other historical figures. These accounts come from eyewitnesses
and were written and circulated when Jesus' followers and critics
were still alive to refute any errors. The extant manuscript
copies are far closer to the original writings than any other
document of antiquity, so there is no reason to doubt their authenticity.
"We know more about
the life of Jesus than just about any other figure in the ancient
world. His birth, life and death are revealed in much more detail
than most ancient figures whose existence is taken for granted
by historians."
Josh McDowell and Don Stewart, Answers
Myth #3: Jesus was
not born of a virgin.
One
argument against the virgin birth is that the Hebrew word in
Isaiah's prophesy, "almah," can
mean "young woman" as well as "virgin' (Isaiah 7:14). But the Greek "parthenos" used
by Matthew and Luke must mean "virgin."
The
virgin birth is set down in the Bible as historical fact. (See Luke 1:26-37; Matthew 1:18-24)
There
are several reasons why the virgin birth was a necessity. The
Bible teaches that the Word who became flesh was with God from
the very beginning (John 1:1). The pre-existence of Christ is
testified many times in the New Testament (John 8:58; Philippians
2:5-11; Colossians 1:15-16). When Jesus came into the world,
he was not a newly created individual such as we are, but the
eternal Son of God. To be born required divine intervention (McDowell,
Answers).
Another
reason was because of his sinless nature. To be a perfect sacrifice,
he must himself be perfect and without sin. The New Testament
teaches that from the day he was born until the day he died,
Jesus was without sin. Had he be born of a human father, he would
have inherited the sin nature that contaminates our race. A miraculous
birth was thus necessary (McDowell, Answers).
"Moreover, if Jesus
had been sired by Joseph, he would not have been able to claim
the legal rights to the throne of David. According to the prophecy
of Jeremiah 22:28-30, there could be no king in Israel who was
a descendant of King Jeconiah, and
Matthew 1:12 relates that Joseph was from the line of Jeconiah.
If Jesus had been fathered by Joseph, he could not rightly inherit
the throne of David, since he was a relative of the cursed line."
Josh McDowell and Don Stewart, Answers
The
Bible records that Joseph had no sexual relations with Mary until
after Jesus' birth, and records that he was known not to have
fathered Jesus and that people assumed Mary had an illicit relationship.
Even Joseph assumed this, and reasonably decided to break off
their betrothal. He knew, as well as we do today, that a virgin
conceiving a baby was a biological impossibility. And yet Joseph
changed his resolve when an angel visited and told him of the
miraculous nature of the conception.
"Some have attempted
to account for the virgin birth by tracing it to Greek or Babylonian
mythology. They argue that the Gospel writers borrowed this story
from the mythology of their day. This view does not fit the facts,
for there is not any hero in pagan mythology for which a virgin
birth is claimed, and moreover it would be unthinkable to the
Jewish mind to construct such a story from mythology.
"Many deities among
the Greeks, Babylonians, and Egyptians were reported born in
an unusual manner, but for the most part these beings never actually
existed. The accounts are filled with obvious mythological elements
which are totally absent from the Gospel narratives. They are
reports of a god or goddess being born into the world by sexual
relations between some heavenly being and an earthly woman, or
by some adulterous affair among the gods and goddesses."
Josh McDowell and Don Stewart, Answers
"All these various
stories of supernatural conceptions and births, which we meet
within folklore and the history of mythology, have this one point
in common--they serve to point not so much to the similarity
as to the complete contrast and dissimilarity which exist between
the Christian birth-story and the tales which are current in
various pagan circles."
Dr. Thomas Thorburn, A Critical
Examination
Myth #4: Jesus was
just a good teacher or prophet.
The
good teacher myth takes many forms. Jesus was a good teacher,
a prophet, a good man who was misunderstood. These forms all
share one major aspect--they deny Christ's deity. If Jesus can
be labeled as a "good teacher," that classes him with
Moses, Zoroaster, and Mohammed and dismisses his Lordship and
divinity.
But
Jesus himself said "Before Abraham was, I
AM." He shared glory with the Father before the world began.
He claimed the power to read men's minds and hearts and to forgive
sins. He claimed to have come down from heaven. He claimed the
power to raise himself from the dead, and witnesses confirmed
his resurrection.
If
he claimed all those things and they were not true, he was not
a good teacher at all, but a liar or a lunatic. Either that, or
his disciples made up the whole rap and put words in his mouth,
making them liars or lunatics.
"Logically, if Jesus
was not divine, as the records unequivocally claim he was, we
are reduced to three, and only three, interpretations of the
New Testament data:
1. Jesus claimed to be
the Son of God but knew he was not. He was a charlatan.
2. Jesus thought he was
the Son of God, but actually was not. He was a lunatic.
3. Jesus never actually
claimed to be the Son of God, though his disciples put this claim
in his mouth. So the disciples were charlatans, lunatics, or
naive exaggerators."
John Warwick Montgomery, History and Christianity
Was Jesus a liar or
charlatan?
Jesus
took pains to warn against lying, and said that those who lie
are the devil's children (John 8:44). Would
he then have lied concerning his own character and purpose?
"The idea of Jesus
as a charlatan--as an intentional deceiver who claimed to be
something he knew he was not--has never had much appeal, even among fanatical anti-religionists.
Jesus' high ethical teachings and noble personal character have
made such an interpretation extremely improbable."
John Warwick Montgomery, History and Christianity
William Lecky,
the great nineteenth-century historian and a non-believer, wrote
of Jesus:
"[The character
of Jesus] has not only been the highest pattern of virtue, but
the strongest incentive to its practice, and has exerted so deep
an influence, that it may be truly said, that the simple record
of three short years of active life has done more to regenerate
and to soften mankind, than all the disquisitions of philosophers
and than all the exhortations of moralists."
W.E.H. Lecky,
History of European Morals from Augustus to Charlemagne
Was Jesus a lunatic?
Did
Jesus honestly misunderstand his nature and believe himself to
be something he was not? Could a human be sane and think of himself
as the eschatological Son of Man who would come again at the
end of the age, with the heavenly host, to judge the world?
No.
A person who believed that of themselves would either have to
be correct or insane. And so, some might argue, Jesus was a lunatic.
"Some paranoids
manifest ideas of grandeur almost entirely, and we find patients
whose grandeur is very largely of a religious nature, such as
their belief that they are directly instructed by God to convert
the world or perform miracles."
Dr. Albert Schweitzer, The Psychiatric Study of Jesus
"We cannot avoid
the conclusion that Jesus was deranged if he thought of himself
as God incarnate and yet was not."
John Warwick Montgomery, History and Christianity
"Yet, in view of
the eminent soundness of Jesus’ teachings, few have been
able to give credence to the idea of mental aberration."
John Warwick Montgomery, History and Christianity
As
psychiatrist J.T. Fisher asserted in 1951:
"If you were to
take the sum total of all authoritative articles ever written
by the most qualified of psychologists and psychiatrists on the
subject of mental hygiene--if you were to combine them and refine
them and cleave out the excess verbiage--if you were to take
the whole of the meat and none of the parsley, and if you were
to have these unadulterated bits of pure scientific knowledge
concisely expressed by the most capable of living poets, you
would have an awkward and incomplete summation of the Sermon
on the Mount. And it would suffer immeasurably through comparison.
For nearly two thousand years the Christian world has been holding
in its hands the complete answer to its restless and fruitless
yearnings. Here ... rests the blueprint for successful human
life with optimum mental health and contentment."
J.T. Fisher and L.S.
Hawley, A Few Buttons Missing
One
can't have it both ways. Jesus' teachings can't exhibit optimum
soundness while the teacher is a lunatic who does not understand
his own nature.
Did Jesus' disciples
paint a false portrait?
Could
not Jesus' followers, in either an intentional or unintentional
attempt to put him in the best possible light, have painted a
false portrait of him? Jews had been waiting for a Messiah. Is
it not possible that this desire for a Messiah led to the deification
of Jesus?
These
theories quickly fall apart upon closer examination.
"First, all types
of Jewish messianic speculation at the time were at variance
with the messianic picture Jesus painted of himself , so he was
a singularly poor candidate for deification. Second, the apostles
and evangelists were psychologically, ethically and religiously
incapable of performing such a deification.
Third, the historical evidence for Christ's resurrection, the
great attesting event for his claims to deity, could not have
been manufactured."
John Warwick Montgomery, History and Christianity
Jesus'
attitudes toward the Gentiles, toward freedom from the yoke of
the law, were not at all what was expected
of the Messiah.
"Zealot activists
expected the redeemer to appear sword in hand and to lead the
people against Rome's military power. ... Most apocalyptic visionaries,
on the other hand, expected redemption in the shape of a cosmic
cataclysm, out of which would emerge a new world with the chosen
people marching toward final salvation at the head of a transformed
mankind."
Jewish scholar S.W.
Baron,
Social and Religious
History of the Jews
Jesus
hardly fulfilled the messianic expectations of his day. Freedom
from Rome. Reuniting of the Jewish
people. A Jewish king returned to the throne. In fact,
the Pharisees were his chief opponents, for he continually set
himself above the law and refused to be bound by legalistic tradition.
He disagreed with the Sadducees, who did not believe in angels
or in the resurrection of the body.
So
if anyone deified Jesus, it must have been his own disciples.
They, too, were Jews. It took them a long time to believe that
this Jesus, so different from what was expected, was the Messiah.
When he was crucified, they doubted it anew. They were down-to-earth
people--fishermen, tax collectors, and the like. To purport such
a fantastic lie, they would themselves have had to be liars or
psychotics.
Instead,
we see a group of men gathered in a locked room following the
crucifixion, all scared lest they, too, be arrested. They were
scattered the night of the arrest, scared for their lives. Then
something happened, and suddenly these frightened disciples of
a crucified teacher went forth boldly and preached the gospel
despite constant threats to their freedom and lives. All but
one died for their faith in Jesus, and the one who was not martyred
died in exile. These few disciples brought Christianity to the
world. Could they have done so knowing it was a lie? There are
those who would die for a cause. And doubtless many have died
for a lie. But would a man deliberately give his life, knowing
it was for a lie?
This
change in the disciples and their subsequent relentless spreading
of the message is one of the strongest arguments for the truth
of the resurrection.
Myth #5 Jesus never
claimed to be God.
This
is a common argument, despite heavy evidence to the contrary.
Even a cursory glance at the gospels reveals that just the opposite
is true: Jesus made many claims that he was the Messiah, the
Son of God, equal to the Father. His disciples clearly regarded
him as the Christ, and all the New Testament books refer to this
claim as fact and even offer prayers to God the Father and Jesus
the Son without discriminating between the two. Even Jesus' enemies
were well aware of his claim to be God, and it was for this "blasphemy" that
he was ultimately put to death. Indeed, had it not been true,
it would have been blasphemy of the highest degree.
Jesus
forgave sins (example, Mark 2), again blasphemy for anyone but
God. He used the term "Son of Man" in reference to
himself, one of the Old Testament's most lofty ascriptions to
God's Messiah.
Among
the religious leaders throughout history, Jesus Christ is unique
in claiming to be God in human flesh. It is a misconception that
other religious leaders made similar claims. Buddha did not claim
to be God, nor did Moses. Muhammad did not identify himself as
Allah, and Zoroaster did not claim to be Ahura Mazda.
But
Christ claimed that he existed before Abraham (John 8:58), that he was equal with the Father (John 5:17-18), that he had the ability to forgive sins
(Mark 2:5-7) (something the Bible teaches only God can do, Isaiah
43:25). The New Testament equated Jesus as the creator of the
universe (John 1:3) and the one who holds all things together
(Colossians 1:17). Paul says that God was manifest in the
flesh (1 Timothy 3:16).
Jesus'
enemies wanted to stone him for blasphemy, "because you,
being a man, make yourself out to be God" (John 10:33).
The
following scriptures are just a sample of several in which Christ's
deity is claimed and affirmed.
John 20:28 records Thomas' confession
upon seeing Jesus' hands, feet, and side, "My Lord and
my God!"
"Therefore God exalted
him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above
every name, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow,
in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue
confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father".
Paul, Philemon 2:10-11
"Again the high
priest asked him, 'Are you the Christ, the Son of the Blessed
One?'
'I am,' said Jesus. 'And
you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the
Mighty One and coming on the clouds of heaven.'
The high priest tore
his clothes. 'Why do we need any more witnesses?' he asked. 'You
have heard the blasphemy. What do you think?'"
Mark 14:61-64
"Therefore go an make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name
of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching
them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am
with you always, to the very end of the age."
Jesus, Matthew 28:19-20
"Anyone who has
seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, 'Show us the Father'? Don't you believe that I am in the Father, and
that the Father is in me? The words I say to you are not just
my own. Rather, it is the Father, living in me, who is doing
his word. Believe me when I say that I am in the Father and the
Father is in me; or at least believe on the evidence of the miracles
themselves."
Jesus, John 14:9-11
Jesus answered, "I
am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father
except through me. If you really knew me, you would know my Father
as well. From now on, you do know him and have seen him."
Jesus, John 14:6
Clearly,
Jesus did claim to be divine, and his disciples came to believe
as well. History shows that the earliest Christians, too, prayed
to Jesus as to the Father, sang songs of worship to him, and
regarded him as one with God.
"Other teachers
adhered to a set of teachings and principles. Jesus did not just
claim to be teaching mankind the truth; he claimed that he was
the truth (John 14:6)."
Josh McDowell and Don Stewart, Answers
"Anybody who would
dare to make such claims would have to be either out of his mind
or a liar, unless he was God. Jesus clearly claimed all these
things and more. If he is God, as he claimed, we must believe
in him, and if he is not, then we should have nothing to do with
him."
Josh McDowell and Don Stewart, Answers
All
right, so Jesus claimed to be God. Why should anyone believe
such a claim?
The
Bible gives miracles and fulfilled prophecy as convincing proof
that Jesus was who he said he was. But the primary sign was the
resurrection. When the religious leaders asked for a sign, Jesus
said, "For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the
belly of the whale, so will the Son of Man be three days and
three nights in the heart of the earth" (Matthew 12:40).
In John 2:19, Jesus was again asked for a sign. He said, "Destroy
this temple, and in three days I will raise it up ... but he
spoke of the temple of his body."
Jesus'
ability to raise himself from the dead separates him from everyone
else in history. Thus anyone wishing to refute the case for Christianity
must explain away the resurrection.
Myth #6: Jesus did
not rise from the dead.
Christ's
resurrection from the dead is an essential element to the Gospel
message. Without it, the rest is meaningless. Jesus himself recognized
that it would serve as proof of his deity:
Then some of the Pharisees
and teachers of the law said to him, "teacher,
we want to see a miraculous sign from you."
He answered, "A
wicked and adulterous generation asks for a miraculous sign!
But none will be given it except the sign of the prophet Jonah. For
as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of a huge
fish, so the Son of Man will be three days and three nights in
the heart of the earth."
Matthew 12:38-40
The
resurrection set Jesus apart from everyone who ever lived and
confirmed that he was the Son of God.
... who through
the Spirit of holiness was declared with power to be the Son
of God by his resurrection from the dead: Jesus Christ our Lord.
Paul, Romans 1:4
And
the apostles recognized the importance of the resurrection as
central to the faith.
But if it is preached
that Christ has been raised from the dead, how can some of you
say that there is no resurrection of the dead? If there is no
resurrection of the dead, then not even Christ has been raised.
And if Christ has not been raised, our preaching is useless and
so is your faith. More than that, we are then found to be false
witnesses about God, for we have testified about God that he
raised Christ from the dead. But he did not raise him if in fact
the de4ad are not raised. For if the dead are not raised, then
Christ has not been raised either. And if Christ has not been
raised, your faith is futile; you are still in your sins. Then
those also who have fallen asleep in Christ are lost. If only
for this life we have hope in Christ, we are to be pitied more
than all men.
Paul, 1 Corinthians
15:12-191
More
recently, Michael Green said it like this:
"Christianity does
not hold the resurrection to be one among many tenants of belief.
Without faith in the resurrection there would be no Christianity
at all. The Christian church would never have begun; the Jesus
movement would have fizzled out like a damp squib with his execution.
Christianity stands or falls with the truth of the resurrection.
Once you disprove it, and you have disposed of Christianity."
Michael Green, Man
Alive
Those
who have set out to discredit the resurrection use different
theories to try to explain it away. Those theories follow.
The "swoon theory"--Jesus
wasn't really dead
The
swoon theory supposes that Jesus didn't really die. He merely
fainted from exhaustion and loss of blood. Everyone thought him
dead, but he later recovered and the disciples thought he rose
from the dead. Some have even suggested Jesus arranged to be
drugged on the cross so that he could feign death and recover
from the beatings, exposure, trauma, and loss of blood.
This
makes no sense. Prisoners occasionally died from the beating
preceding crucifixion. Jesus went through such a scourging. If
it was a plot, it was an extremely foolish one, for he could
not have expected to survive the beating and crucifixion. After
the beating, he was so weakened he could not carry the cross
to Golgotha. In fact, the Bible records that he collapsed.
Death by crucifixion followed, and Frederick Farrar attempts to describe what such a
death was like:
"Death by crucifixion
seems to include all that pain and death can have of horrible
and ghastly--dizziness, cramp, thirst, starvation, sleeplessness,
traumatic fever, tetanus, shame, publicity of shame, long continuance
of torment, horror of anticipation, mortification of untended
wounds--all intensified just up to the point at which they can
be endured at all, but all stopping just short of the point which
would give to the sufferer the relief of unconsciousness.
"The unnatural position
made every movement painful; the lacerated veins and crushed
tendons throbbed with incessant anguish; the wounds, inflamed
by exposure, gradually gangrened; the arteries--especially at
the head and stomach--became swollen and oppressed with surcharged
blood; and while each variety of misery went on gradually increasing,
there was added to them the intolerable pang of a burning and
raging thirst; and all these physical complications caused an
internal excitement and anxiety, which made the prospect of death
itself--of death, the unknown enemy, at whose approach man usually
shudders most--bear the aspect of delicious and exquisite release."
Frederick Farrar
During
this torment, Jesus was pierced in the side with a spear. Following
hours of this sort of treatment, Jesus was removed from the cross
after a Roman centurion certified he was dead. There was some
surprise that he died so quickly, and as a result his legs were not broken, as was
the custom to hasten death.
"The disciples of
Jesus may not have been as sophisticated as twentieth century
man in the realm of scientific knowledge, but they surely knew
the difference between someone who was dead and someone who wasn't."
Josh McDowell and Don Stewart, Answers
To
suppose that Jesus not only survived that experience, but then
walked whole and unharmed out of the sealed tomb to proclaim
that death was conquered, is beyond ludicrous. It must also be
considered that, where other criminals might hope to escape closer
inspection (though they could not hope to escape death), this
man, whose claims that he would rise again were widely known,
would have had to have been most certainly dead before the Romans
would have handed over his body.
The bodysnatchers theory
-- Someone stole the body
The
Bible itself mentions this myth. After the resurrection, some
of the soldiers who had been guarding the tomb went to the chief
priests and reported what had happened. Matthew reports:
When the chief priests
had met with the elders and devised a plan, they gave the soldiers
a large sum of money, telling them, "you are to say, 'His disciples
came during the night and stole him away while we were asleep.'
If this report gets to the governor, we will satisfy him and
keep you out of trouble." So the soldiers took the money
and did as they were instructed. And this story has been widely
circulated among the Jews to this very day.
Matthew 28:12-15
Many
factors make this story impossible to believe. The stone, for
example, most likely weighed a couple of tons. The women, on
their way to the tomb Sunday morning, wondered aloud who would
roll the stone away for them (Mark 16:3). It would have required
several men and a great deal of noise to remove the stone.
The
chief priests had requested a detachment of soldiers from Pilate
(from four to sixteen men) to guard the tomb. These would have
been trained fighting men, under Roman law penalized by death
for failing their mission or falling asleep at their post.
Christ
was publically put in the tomb on Friday.
On Sunday morning, the body was missing. If he did not rise from
the dead, then someone took the body. There are three groups
that could have taken the body: the Romans, the Jews, or the
disciples.
The
Romans would have had no reason to steal the body, since they
wanted to keep the peace in Palestine.
The
Jews would not have taken the body, because the last thing they
wanted was a proclamation of the resurrection. In fact, they
asked for the Roman guard (Matthew 27) to make sure no one stole
the body.
The
disciples of Jesus had no reason to steal the body, and if they
did, they later died for something they knew to be untrue.
"Those who entertain
the stolen body myth suppose that a group of disciples, who days
before had run like scared bunny rabbits, confronted a guard
of heavily armed, battle-trained Roman soldiers. They either
overpowered them or snuck past them in their sleep to move a
two-ton stone up an incline without waking a single man. Then,
so the thinking goes, the disciples carted off Jesus' body, hid
it somewhere and, over the course of the next several decades,
endured ridicule, torture, and martyrdom to spread a lie--what
they knew to be a lie--throughout the known world.
"On the contrary,
however, that is too much to believe."
Josh McDowell and
Bob Hostetler, Don't Check Your Brains at the Door
The wrong tomb theory
-- The tomb was empty because it was not the right tomb
There
are actually a few who cling to the theory that the women went
to the wrong tomb, and that's why Jesus' body was not there.
This
point hardly deserves an answer. However, some of the more obvious
flaws in this theory follow.
First,
the women went together, and the two Marys had
been there already.
Second,
there were angels awaiting them, with a message: "Jesus
is not here, he is risen." Did
the angels, too, visit the wrong tomb?
Third,
Peter and John, not believing the women's testimony, ran to the
tomb themselves, and they, too, found it empty. Did they, also,
run to the same wrong empty tomb? It's starting to seem coincidental
that all these witnesses happened upon the same "wrong tomb" ...
Fourth,
the stone and Roman seal marked Jesus' tomb and would not have
been present at the wrong one.
Fifth,
the chief priests and Romans would have been all too happy to
point out the mistake and locate the right tomb, and the body.
The fact of the matter is ...
The
facts just don't support any other theory than the truth--Jesus
did rise from the dead and appear to his disciples.
The
accounts of his appearances are recorded for us by eyewitnesses
to whom Jesus appeared alive over a forty-day period after his
public crucifixion. (Acts 1:3)
Writing
about AD 56, the Apostle Paul mentions that more than 500 people
had witnessed the resurrected Christ at one time and most of
them were still living when he wrote (1 Corinthians 15:6). This
is a challenge to those who might not have believed, since Paul
is saying that there are many people yet living who could be
interviewed to find out if Christ had indeed risen.
Not
only is there evidence to support the resurrection, but there
is also a severe lack of evidence to support any alternative
explanation. So many people in Jesus' day opposed him and wanted
to destroy his following. All they would have had to do was produce
a body. They could not. By far the most logical explanation is
the one the Bible presents: They could not disprove the resurrection
because it actually happened. They could not produce a dead body
because there was not one--Jesus rose from the dead, and that
fact is attested by historical evidence and eyewitness accounts.
"The theories attempting
to give an alternative explanation to the resurrection take more
faith to believe than the resurrection itself."
Josh McDowell and Don Stewart, Answers
Myth #7: There are
contradictions in the four resurrection accounts.
If
the Gospels were placed in four parallel columns, a number of
apparent differences would be highlighted. However, these ultimately
help confirm the truthfulness of the accounts, rather than refute
them. None of the four gospels give all the details. There would
be no need for four gospels if they did. And it would appear
contrived and suspicious.
Only
Matthew records the first appearance to the women. Only Luke
records the account of the two disciples on the road to Emmaus.
Mark and John record the appearance of Mary Magdalene. Only John
records the appearance of the Lord in the upper room when Thomas
was absent, and the appearance on the Sea of Galilee.
This
is to be expected. No four witnesses would write up the same
description of the same event, detail for detail. If they did,
there would be obvious collusion.
The
main points are agreed upon by every witness. Additional details
do not discredit the account, but increase its credibility. The
details do not contradict each other, but work together to create
a bigger picture.
One
apparent contradiction concerns the time the women came to the
tomb. Mark's account has the women coming to the tomb at the
rising of the sun. John states that Mary Magdalene came to the
tomb when it was dark. However, there would have been a walk
of quite some distance from Jerusalem or Bethany, and in order to reach the tomb at sunrise,
the women would have had to leave while it was still dark.
Another
area which appears contradictory concerns the angels at the tomb.
Matthew and Mark relate that one angel addressed the women. Luke
and John report two angels at the tomb. However, Matthew and
Mark do not say that there was only one angel at the tomb, but
that one angel spoke to the women.
"Though they report
some of the details differently, the Gospels agree in all important
points. The accounts are in harmony on the fact that Jesus was
dead and buried; that the disciples were not prepared for his
death, but were totally confused; that the tomb was empty on
Easter morning; that the empty tomb did not convince them that
Jesus had risen; that Mary thought the body had been stolen.
"The gospel writers
also concur that the disciples had certain experiences which
they believed to be appearances of the resurrected Christ. That
normative first century Judaism had no concept of a dying and
rising Messiah is a historical fact.
"The disciples proclaimed
the resurrection story in Jerusalem, in the place where Jesus had been killed
and buried. All these facts considered together constitute a
powerful argument for the validity of the resurrection story."
Josh McDowell and Don Stewart, Answers
"In these fundamental
truths, there are absolutely no contradictions. The so-called
variations in the narratives are only the details which were
most vividly impressed on one mind or another of the witnesses
of our Lord's resurrection, or on the mind of the writers of
these four respective Gospels.
"The closest, most
critical examination of these narratives throughout the ages
never has destroyed and can never destroy their powerful testimony
to the truth that Christ did rise from the dead on the third
day, and was seen of many.'
Wilbur Smith, The Supernaturalness of
Christ |